Tesis - MH
TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEWENANGAN PERADILAN MILITER SETELAH TUNDUKNYA PRAJURIT TNI PADA PERADILAN UMUM IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 65 AYAT (2) UNDANG UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 34 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG TENTARA NASIONAL INDONESIA
ABSTRACT
Under Law No. 31 of 1997 on Military Justice soldiers who commit crimes, both general crime and military criminal trial in military Peeradilan, then based on Law No. 34 of 2004 on the TNI in Article 65 paragraph (2) stated that Soldiers are subject to the power of military courts in cases of violation of military criminal law and subject to the power of the General Court in the case of violation of the general criminal law. Subordination provisions of Army personnel in the general court in the case of common crime is up to now not be implemented, because there are difficulties in implementation include: Aspects of Substance of the law, the legal structure and the cultural aspect of the law and not dilakukannnya changes to the Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, KUHPM, laws number: 31 of 1997 on Military Justice as the basis of subordination soldiers on the General Court. The problem in this study were: 1) What is the authority of military courts after the subjugation of Army personnel at the General Court in the case of common crime after the enactment of Act No. 34 of 2004, 2) What are the difficulties encountered in the application relating to the organizational structure , coaching units and sociological impact for soldiers. This study uses normative research is research that is based on secondary data sources such as the rules and regulations, court decisions, legal theories and opinions of legal scholars. Moreover conducted an assessment of the positive law relating to the issues researched and supported by interviews. Expected if the military members who commit common crimes be tried in public courts, the course of the trial process more objective and transparent, because it is done by a civilian judge is not bound by the military chain of command. In conclusion jurisdiction provisions set out in Article 65 paragraph (2) of Law No. 34 Year 2004 on the TNI jurisdiction over offenses approach can not be applied purely because of the possibility of a conflict between the jurisdiction of the judicial practice, that when Army personnel committed general criminal and military offenses at the same time, the difficulty of the legal aspects of the structure is the absence of rules that are clear and unequivocal control who has the right to investigation, prosecution against Army personnel who perform general crime. His advice is to subjugation Army personnel who commit crimes to justice the general public, the immediate renewal of the Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, KUHPM, KUHAPMIL thoroughly by looking at the substantive aspects, structure and culture.
Keywords : Juridical Review, Authority, Military Justice, Crime General, the General Court, the Indonesian National Army.
Tidak ada salinan data
Tidak tersedia versi lain